Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 104
Filter
1.
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ; 82(Suppl 1):543-544, 2023.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-20245440

ABSTRACT

BackgroundThe presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) has been observed in patients with COVID-19 (1,2), suggesting that they may be associated with deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or stroke in severe cases (3). Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disorder and the most common form of acquired thrombophilia globally. At least one clinical criterion, vascular thrombosis (arterial, venous or microthrombosis) or pregnancy morbidity and at least one laboratory criterion- positive aPL two times at least 12 weeks apart: lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin (aCL), anti-β2-glycoprotein 1 (anti-β2GPI) antibody, have to be met for international APS classification criteria(4). Several reports also associate anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT) with APS.ObjectivesTo combine clinical data on arterial/venous thrombosis and pregnancy complications before and during hospitalisation with aPL laboratory findings at 4 time points (hospital admission, worsening of COVID-19, hospital discharge, and follow-up) in patients with the most severe forms of COVID-19 infection.MethodsPatients with COVID-19 pneumonia were consequetively enrolled, as they were admitted to the General hospital Pancevo. Exclusion criteria were previous diagnosis of inflammatory rheumatic disease and diagnosis of APS. Clinical data were obtained from the medical records. Laboratory results, including LA, aCL, anti-β2GPI, and aPS/PT antibodies were taken at hospital admission, worsening (defined as cytokine storm, connection of the patient to the respirator, use of the anti-IL-6 drug- Tocilizumab), at hospital discharge and at 3-months follow-up and sent to University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia for analysis. Statistics was performed by using SPSS 21.Results111 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were recruited;7 patients died during hospitalisation (none were aPL-positive on admission and at the time of worsening), 3 due to pulmonary artery embolism. All patients were treated according to a predefined protocol which included antibiotics, corticosteroids, anticoagulation therapy and specific comorbidity drugs;patients with hypoxia were supported with oxygen. During hospitalisation, pulmonary artery thrombosis occurred in 5 patients, one was aPL-positive at all time points (was diagnosed with APS), others were negative. In addition, 9/101 patients had a history of thrombosis (5 arterial thrombosis (coronary and cerebral arteries), none of whom was aPL-positive on admission and at follow-up, and 4 venous thrombosis, one of which was aPL-positive at all time points and received an APS diagnosis). Among 9/101 patients with a history of thrombosis, 55.6% were transiently positive at the time of discharge, compared to patients without prior thrombosis, in whom 26.1% were transiently positive at the hospital release (p=0.074). Two patients had a history of pregnancy complications (both had miscarriage after 10th week of gestation), but did not have aPL positivity at any time point.ConclusionAlthough aPL was expected to be associated with vascular disease in the most severe forms of COVID-19, all patients that have died in our cohort were aPL negative. At hospital discharge, 56% of patients with a history of arterial or venous thrombosis had positive aPL that became negative at the 3-months follow-up (were transienlty positive), which should be considered when prescribing therapy after hospitalisation.References[1]Trahtemberg U, Rottapel R, Dos Santos CC, et al. Anticardiolipin and other antiphospholipid antibodies in critically ill COVID-19 positive and negative patients. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2021;80:1236-1240.[2]Stelzer M, Henes J, Saur S. The Role of Antiphospholipid Antibodies in COVID-19. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2021;23(9):72-4.[3]Xie Y, Wang X, Yang P, Zhang S. COVID-19 complicated by acute pulmonary embolism. Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging 2020: 2: e200067.[4]Miyakis S, Lockshin MD, Atsumi T, Branch DW, Brey RL, et al. J.Thromb.Haemost. 2006;4: 295-306.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of nterestsNone Declared.

2.
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ; 82(Suppl 1):2045, 2023.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-20240488

ABSTRACT

BackgroundThe workload at rheumatology clinics have been growing relentlessly and an audit on new.referrals helps to identify referral behaviour of primary care doctors and improvement can be done by providing further training.ObjectivesTo audit on new referral cases to rheumatology clinic from 2020-2022 and to identify new cases with misdiagnosis for future training purpose.MethodsThis was a retrospective study. The medical records of all new referral to rheumatology clinic Hospital Sultan Ismail and Hospital Pakar Sultanah Fatimah from 1st January 2020 to 31th November 2022 were reviewed. The referral diagnosis and final diagnosis were identified and analysed.ResultsThere were total of 927 new cases referral throughout the 35 months during Covid-19pandemic. Majority of them were diagnosed to have rheumatoid arthritis (217/927)followed by systemic lupus erythematosus (190/927), psoriatic arthritis (147/927),gout (62/927), osteoarthritis (58/927), systemic sclerosis (25/927), ankylosing spondylitis (25/927), soft tissue rheumatism (24/927), Sjogren syndrome (24/927),mixed connective tissue disease (14/927), vasculitis (11/927), fibromyalgia (10/927),polymyositis (7/927) and miscellaneous (39/927).45 out of the new cases were diagnosed as unlikely rheumatic diseases. There were 29pending cases awaiting final diagnosis.212 of the referrals were identified as misdiagnosis with the highest as nodal osteoarthritis.(55/212) followed by unlikely rheumatic disease (43/212), soft tissue rheumatism (24/212),psoriatic arthritis (20/212), Sjogren syndrome (14/212), gout (8/212), rheumatoid arthritis (7/212), fibromyalgia (6/212), systemic lupus erythematosus (5/212), ankylosing spondylitis (4/212), mixed connective tissue disease (3/212), systemic sclerosis (2/212), polymyositis (2/212) and others (19/212): diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis, hypermobility syndrome, RS3PE syndrome, idiopathic uveitis, graft versus host disease, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, antiphospholipid syndrome, hypothyroidism, post streptococcal arthritis, prolapsed intervertebral disc, cerebrovascular disease, traumatic sternoclavicular joint subluxation, ledderhose disease, paraspinal muscle spasm and viral myalgia).ConclusionNodal osteoarthritis and soft tissue rheumatism can be great mimicker for inflammatory.arthritis and if wrongly diagnosed will lead to unnecessary anxiety or wrong treatment. More training is needed to improve clinical skills amongst primary care doctors.ReferencesNA.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.

3.
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ; 82(Suppl 1):1899-1900, 2023.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-20239734

ABSTRACT

BackgroundPatients with pre-existing rheumatic diseases may be exacerbated during SARS-CoV-2 infection, or may develop new autoimmune features. Furthermore, immunosuppressive agents used to treat autoimmunity-inflammation as well as comorbidities can also affect the disease outcome.ObjectivesTo evaluate the outcome of rheumatic diseases after Covid 19 infection in patients diagnosed with rheumatic diseases, under various immunosuppressive treatment, as well as the effects of vaccines against Covid or antiviral treatment in this sensitive population group.MethodsDuring the pandemic, 1493 patients with autoimmune or autoinflammatory disease who were continuously followed up in two tertiaries hospitals in northern and northwestern Greece were included in the current study. The patients were compared with 769 controls after adjustment for age, sex, weight, vaccination status and comorbidities. Of the 1493 patients, 648 had rheumatoid arthritis, 282 psoriatic arthritis, 173 ankylosing spondylitis, 122 systemic lupus erythematosus, 98 Sjogren's syndrome, 43 polymyalgia rheumatica, 34 mixed connective tissue disease or overlapping syndromes, 31 vasculitis, 27 systemic sclerosis, 18 myositis, 10 Behcet syndrome, 5 primary antiphospholipid syndrome and 2 had Familial Mediterranean Fever. The vast majority of patients and controls were fully vaccinated (82%) and 397 patients received antiviral treatment, 94% of them were fully vaccinated.ResultsCovid 19 disease in vaccinated patients with rheumatic diseases was shown to perform the same or about the same as those in the control group after adjustment for risk factors for severe disease. 19 of our patients required admission in the intensive care unit (62% full vaccinated) while a total of 12 died (66% non vaccinated). Major risk factors for severe disease were previous respiratory failure, chronic renal impairment, obesity, and failure to receive antiviral therapy. It was also shown that infection with Covid led to an exacerbation or induction of autoimmune disorders in 25 of the participants.ConclusionIn this large cohort, Covid 19 disease was shown to affect patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases the same or approximately the same way as the general population if they are fully vaccinated and if they start timely antiviral treatment where indicated. Further research and monitoring of the results after the multiple mutations of the virus is advisable.ReferencesNone.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.

4.
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ; 82(Suppl 1):1901-1902, 2023.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-20237220

ABSTRACT

BackgroundPatients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IRD) have poorer outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to the general population.ObjectivesTo assess and compare clinical course, severity and complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with rheumatic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) from Mexico and Argentina.MethodsData from both national registries, CMR-COVID (Mexico) and SAR-COVID (Argentina), were combined. Briefly, adult IRD patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection were recruited between 08.2020 and 09.2022 in SAR-COVID and between 04.2020 and 06.2022 in CMR-COVID. Sociodemographic data, comorbidities, and DMARDs were recorded, as well as clinical characteristics, complications, and treatment for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Descriptive analysis. Chi square, Fisher, Student T, Mann Whitney U tests and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed.ResultsA total of 3709 patients were included, 1167 (31.5%) from the CMR-COVID registry and 2542 (68.5%) from the SAR-COVID registry. The majority (82.3%) were women, with a mean age of 50.4 years (SD 14.4). The most frequent IRD were rheumatoid arthritis (47.5%) and systemic lupus erythematosus (18.9%). Mexican patients were significantly older, had a higher female predominance and had higher prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis, antiphospholipid syndrome, and axial spondyloarthritis, while the Argentine patients had more frequently psoriatic arthritis and ANCA-associated vasculitis. In both cohorts, approximately 80% were in remission or low disease activity at the time of infection. Mexicans took glucocorticoids (43% vs 37%, p<0.001) and rituximab (6% vs 3%, p<0.001) more frequently. They also reported more comorbidities (48% vs 43%, p=0.012).More than 90% of patients presented symptoms related to SARS-CoV-2 infection. The frequency of hospitalization was comparable between the groups (23.4%), however, the Mexicans had more severe disease (Figure 1) and a higher mortality rate (9.4% vs 4.0%, p<0.0001). After adjusting for risk factors, Mexicans were more likely to die due to COVID-19 (OR 2.2, 95%CI 1.5-3.1).ConclusionIn this cohort of patients with IRD from Mexico and Argentina with SARS-CoV-2 infection, the majority presented symptoms, a quarter were hospitalized and 6% died due to COVID-19. Mexicans presented more severe disease, and after considering risk factors they were two times more likely to die.REFERENCES:NIL.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsCarolina Ayelen Isnardi Grant/research support from: SAR-COVID is a multi- sponsor registry, where Pfizer, Abbvie, and Elea Phoenix provided unrestricted grants. None of them participated or infuenced the development of the project, data collection, analysis, interpretation, or writing the report. They do not have access to the information collected in the database, Deshire Alpizar-Rodriguez: None declared, Marco Ulises Martínez-Martínez: None declared, Rosana Quintana: None declared, Ingrid Eleonora Petkovic: None declared, Sofia Ornella: None declared, Vanessa Viviana Castro Coello: None declared, Edson Velozo: None declared, David Zelaya: None declared, María Severina: None declared, Adriana Karina Cogo: None declared, Romina Nieto: None declared, Dora Aida Pereira: None declared, Iris Jazmin Colunga-Pedraza: None declared, Fedra Irazoque-Palazuelos: None declared, GRETA CRISTINA REYES CORDERO: None declared, Tatiana Sofía Rodriguez-Reyne: None declared, JOSE ANTONIO VELOZ ARANDA: None declared, Cassandra Michele Skinner Taylor: None declared, INGRID MARIBEL JUAREZ MORA: None declared, Beatriz Elena Zazueta Montiel: None declared, Atzintli Martínez: None declared, Cesar Francisco Pacheco Tena: None declared, Guillermo Pons-Estel: None declared.

5.
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ; 82(Suppl 1):1495-1496, 2023.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-20236003

ABSTRACT

BackgroundVaccinations comprise a part of the antenatal care of pregnant women, including patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who are at increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs). While COVID-19 vaccination has been shown to be safe in patients with SLE, data on vaccine-associated adverse events (AEs) during the antenatal and lactation period are scarce or lacking.ObjectivesTo investigate the association between COVID-19 vaccination and AEs in pregnant SLE patients.MethodsA total of 9201 complete responses were extracted on June 21st, 2022 from the COVID-19 Vaccination in Autoimmune Diseases (COVAD) 2 database, a global e-survey involving 157 collaborators from 106 countries. Among respondents, 6787 (73.8%) were women. We identified 70 (1.1%) women who were exposed to at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose during pregnancy, among those 11 with SLE. Delayed onset (>7 days) vaccine-related AEs were extracted and triangulated with disease activity, treatment changes due to flare after vaccination, and COVID-19 infections in vaccinated pregnant women with SLE. Additionally, information on health-related quality of life and physical function was recorded using PROMIS at the time of survey completion.ResultsThe age of patients ranged from 28 to 39 years;5/11 women were of Asian origin. None of these patients reported major vaccine AEs, including four patients with self-reported active SLE prior to the vaccination. None of them reported any change in the status of their autoimmune disease, and no hospitalisation or special treatment was recorded. Six women experienced minor vaccine AEs;two of them had active disease prior to vaccination. Four patients reported COVID-19 infection;two of them while they were pregnant and post-vaccination and two prior to pregnancy and vaccination. All four patients experienced symptoms of their disease, but no overt SLE flare was reported. At the time of survey completion, all patients reported their general health as being good to excellent in all aspects evaluated. Importantly, no APOs were reported.None of the patients reported thrombotic events post-vaccination, which provides some reassurance regarding COVID-19 vaccination in a patient population with a high risk for cardiovascular comorbidity and thrombosis, especially in the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies or in patients diagnosed with the antiphospholipid syndrome, a considerable portion within SLE populations. Moreover, it was reassuring to note an absence of association between experienced vaccine AEs and active disease prior to vaccination. Although minor AEs were common, they did not impair daily functioning, and the symptoms resolved in all patients after a median of 3 (IQR: 2.5–5.0) days.ConclusionOur report adds relevant evidence concerning the sensitive issue of COVID-19 vaccine AEs and flares in SLE patients during the antenatal and lactation period. Despite the small sample size, the findings provide some reassurance and can contribute to informed decisions regarding vaccination in patients with SLE and high-risk pregnancies due to their background autoimmune disease. Based on the present data, the risk/benefit ration of COVID-19 vaccination appears favourable, with vaccines both providing passive immunisation to the fetus and active immunisation to the mother with no signals of exacerbation of the mother's autoimmune disease.Figure 1.Timeline showing COVID-19 vaccination and vaccination-related minor adverse events in relation to gestational and post-partum periods in eleven pregnant/lactating women with systemic lupus erythematosus.[Figure omitted. See PDF]AcknowledgementsThe authors thank all survey respondents, as well as patient associations and all members of the COVAD study group for their invaluable role in the data collection.Disclosure of InterestsNefeli Giannopoulou: None declared, Latika Gupta: None declared, Laura Andreoli: None declared, Daniele Lini: None declared, Elena Nikiphorou: None declared, Rohit Aggarwal Grant/research support from: R.A. has a consultancy relationshi with and/or has received research funding from Bristol Myers-Squibb, Pfizer, Genentech, Octapharma, CSL Behring, Mallinckrodt, AstraZeneca, Corbus, Kezar, Abbvie, Janssen, Kyverna Alexion, Argenx, Q32, EMD-Serono, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roivant, Merck, Galapagos, Actigraph, Scipher, Horizon Therapeutics, Teva, Beigene, ANI Pharmaceuticals, Biogen, Nuvig, Capella Bioscience, and CabalettaBio., Vikas Agarwal: None declared, Ioannis Parodis Grant/research support from: I.P. has received research funding and/or honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, Elli Lilly and Company, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG.

6.
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ; 82(Suppl 1):1891, 2023.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-20234948

ABSTRACT

BackgroundFacing the outburst of the COVID-19 pandemic, we gradually comprehend its pathophysiology as a coagulopathy characterized by increased risks of arterial, venous, and microvascular thrombosis. Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune, thrombo-inflammatory disease characterized by thrombosis and/or pregnancy loss in the presence of one or more antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL).ObjectivesTo evaluate the clinical scenario of COVID-19 in the APS population of patients.MethodsThis is a single-center, observational, cross-sectional study. Data regarding the severity of COVID-19 (severe COVID-19 considered if interstitial pneumonia was diagnosed), COVID-19 vaccinal status, and post-vaccinal reactions (divided into mild, consisting of fever, myalgia, nausea, and severe if thrombosis at any point occurred) were collected from 44 APS patients (21 with primary and 23 with APS associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 90.1% female). aPL analysis included the detection of aCL (IgG/IgM), ß2GPI (IgG/IgM), and LA Results were compared to the control group consisting of 31 healthy individuals, with no APS, matched to the APS group regarding age and gender.ResultsAt the moment of COVID-19 infection, 75% of the APS group was taking Aspirin, 15.9% warfarin, 2.3% non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant, 59.1% chloroquine, 31.8% corticosteroid, 2.3% methotrexate. None of the above-mentioned medications were taken from a control group. There was no difference regarding the severity of COVID-19 between APS patients and healthy controls: 84.1% of APS had mild and 15.9% severe COVID-19 (p=0.509, p=0.292 respectively). But the difference regarding the need for hospitalization was significant (none of the healthy controls compared to 11.4% APS patients, p=0.0073). Interestingly, COVID-19 occurred in 72.7% of APS patients before the COVID-19 vaccination compared to 35.5% of healthy controls, p=0.001, conversely, a significantly lower percentage of vaccinated APS patients had COVID-19 compared to healthy controls (34.1% to 71.0%, p=0.002). 27% of APS patients had mild post-vaccinal reactions, none with severe.ConclusionDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, APS patients in Serbia were at higher risk for hospitalization. However, there was no difference in the severity of clinical presentation compared to non -the APS population. We can only speculate that APS therapy consisting of Aspirin, Chloroquine, and oral anticoagulant therapy contributed to this finding. Moreover, COVID-19 vaccination in the APS population, followed by a low incidence of mild post-vaccinal reactions, had more benefits in protection than in non-APS individuals.REFERENCES:NIL.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.

7.
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ; 82(Suppl 1):1909, 2023.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-20233178

ABSTRACT

BackgroundCoagulopathy, thromboembolic events and DIC during COVID-19 infection has been reported. Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs), present in 1–5 % of healthy individuals. aPLs are associated with the risk of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) which is associated with higher risk of thrombosis.ObjectivesWe wanted to see if patients with known APS or aPLs only are at higher risk of a thrombotic event compared to control when developed COVID-19. We retrospectively review EMR for over a year for thrombotic events in patients with COVID and prior history of APS or aPLs only and matched them to control.MethodsPatient characteristics and laboratory testing were summarized according to the following groups: APS, aPLs detected or control. The control were matched according to age and gender for each group. Continuous variable were summarized as median (range) and mean (standard deviation), while categorical variables were reported as frequency (percentage). The binary patient outcome of thrombotic event, hospitalization for COVID, death, and composite event (the combined occurrence of thrombotic events, hospitalization, death) were calculated and interpreted as the multiplicative increase in odds of the given outcome for aPL group compared to control group. Multivariable logistic regression models were adjusted for potential risk factors (immobilization, hypertension, coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, and smoking) one at a time due to the rare occurrences of events studied.ResultsIn single variable analysis (unadjusted) the odds of the patient having a thrombotic event was approximately 27 times higher in patients with aPL only compared to Controls (P<0.001). We see similar results in multivariable analyses (adjusted) adjusting for the following variables one at a time: immobilization, hypertension, coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, and smoking. In each of the multivariable analyses, the adjusted odds of a thrombotic event was between approximately 24 and 29 times higher in patients with aPL Antibody Only compared to Controls (all P<0.001) indicating that association of aPL Antibody Only with thrombotic event was independent of immobilization, hypertension, coronary artery disease, diabetes, and smoking. There was no statistically significant risk of thrombosis in APS group vs control. Majority of patients with APS were on chronic anticoagulation.ConclusionWe found a statistical significantly difference in patient with aPLs only versus control regarding risk of thrombosis when developed COVID-19. No statistically significant risk was noted in patients with APS. While chronic anticoagulation in APS patients is protective it seemed that patient with aPLs only do carry a high risk of thrombosis if any inciting factors like COVID-19.References[1]C. Huang, Y. Wang, X. Li et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China, Lancet 395 (2020)[2]A. Jayarangaiah, P.T. Kariyanna, X. Chen, A. Jayarangaiah, A. Kumar, COVID-19- Associated coagulopathy: an exacerbated immunothrombosis response, Clin. Appl. Thromb. 26 (2020)[3]Y. Zhang, M. Xiao, S. Zhang et al. Coagulopathy and antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with Covid-19, N. Engl. J. Med. 382 (2020)[4]K.J. Lackner, N. Müller-Calleja, Pathogenesis of antiphospholipid syndrome: recent insights and emerging concepts, Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 15 (2019)Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.

8.
Biomedicines ; 11(5)2023 Apr 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20234920

ABSTRACT

We sought to determine the prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) and their correlation with COVID-19 severity (in terms of clinical and laboratory parameters) in patients without thrombotic events during the early phase of infection. This was a cross-sectional study with the inclusion of hospitalized COVID-19 patients from a single department during the COVID-19 pandemic (April 2020-May 2021). Previous known immune disease or thrombophilia along with long-term anticoagulation and patients with overt arterial or venous thrombosis during SARS-CoV-2 infection were excluded. In all cases, data on four criteria for aPL were collected, namely lupus anticoagulant (LA), IgM and IgG anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), as well as IgG anti-ß2 glycoprotein I antibodies (aß2GPI). One hundred and seventy-nine COVID-19 patients were included, with a mean age of 59.6 (14.5) years and a sex ratio of 0.8 male: female. LA was positive in 41.9%, while it was strongly positive in 4.5%; aCL IgM was found in 9.5%, aCL IgG in 4.5%, and aß2GPI IgG in 1.7% of the sera tested. Clinical correlation: LA was more frequently expressed in severe COVID-19 cases than in moderate or mild cases (p = 0.027). Laboratory correlation: In univariate analysis, LA levels were correlated with D-dimer (p = 0.016), aPTT (p = 0.001), ferritin (p = 0.012), C-reactive protein (CRP) (p = 0.027), lymphocyte (p = 0.040), and platelet (p < 0.001) counts. However, in the multivariate analysis, only the CRP levels correlated with LA positivity: OR (95% CI) 1.008 (1.001-1.016), p = 0.042. LA was the most common aPL identified in the acute phase of COVID-19 and was correlated with infection severity in patients without overt thrombosis.

9.
Rheumatology (United Kingdom) ; 62(Supplement 2):ii151, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2323809

ABSTRACT

Background/Aims In December 2019, a new type of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) was identified in Wuhan, China. The likelihood of developing an autoimmune and/or rheumatic diseases in COVID-19 survivors is high and a serious matter. The acute SARS-CoV-2 infection may unmask previously undiagnosed rheumatic conditions. We aimed to study rheumatic autoimmune disease manifestations diseases following COVID-19 infection survival. Methods The study was an observational case series study. The data collection was carried out in Iraqi Kurdistan region between the 1st of July 2021 and 20th of March 2022. Seventy-five patients were included: the patients who previously had confirmed COVID-19 infection who developed symptoms of rheumatic autoimmune diseases post COVID-19 cure. The study was conducted via a rigorous evaluation by two rheumatologists. Patients were investigated by (ESR (mm/h) and CRP (mg/L), some autoimmune screen panel for suspecting rheumatological disease patients were sent for ANA, anti-CCP (U/ML) and rheumatoid factor (IU/M) L. Then, patients were diagnosed according to the classification criteria for suspected autoimmune diseases and those with exacerbation were evaluated clinically and by laboratory;rheumatoid arthritis by DAS28, systemic lupus erythematosus by C3, C4. Results A total of seventy-five participants post-COVID-19 infection were enrolled in this study. Age of the participants was 47.15 +/-16.18 SD, more of the participants were female (69) out of 75. For most of the patients the ESR were high with p value of 0.012, which was statistically significant. ANA was high titre in SLE patients which was (3.05+/-2.4) and in antiphospholipid syndrome p-value was significant at 0.042, Anti-CCP were positive in RA patients and in those with exacerbation of RA (44+/-10, 31.7+/-5.7 respectively), DAS28 was (4.95+/-0.59) moderate and high disease activity in patients with exacerbations. C3, C4 were low in patients with exacerbation of SLE (0.47+/-0.22, 0.03+/-0.01, respectively). Most of the patients developed symptoms post-COVID-19 between 4-10 weeks (37 participants). Conclusion Rheumatic autoimmune diseases presenting post-COVID-19 survival most commonly were systemic lupus erythematous followed by rheumatoid arthritis. and previous autoimmune diseases presented with exacerbation. (Table Presented).

10.
Journal of Clinical Rheumatology ; 29(4 Supplement 1):S6, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2323777

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) present greater severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to the general population, particularly those with glomerulonephritis and who are treated with glucocorticoids. Likewise, high disease activity and some immunosuppressants have been associated with worse outcomes. The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with SLE in Argentina from the SAR-COVID registry and to establish factors associated with a worse outcome. Method(s): Observational study. Patients diagnosed with SLE with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (RT-PCR and/or positive serology) from the SAR-COVID registry were included. Data were collected from August 2020 to March 2022. The outcome of the infection was measured using the World Health Organization-ordinal scale (WHO-OS). Severe COVID-19 was defined as an WHO-OS value >=5. Descriptive analysis, Student's t , Mann Whitney U, ANOVA, Chi2 and Fisher's tests. Multivariable logistic regression. Result(s): A total of 399 patients were included, 93%female, with a mean age of 40.9 years (SD 12.2), 39.6% had at least one comorbidity. At the time of infection, 54.9% were receiving glucocorticoids, 30.8% immunosuppressants, and 3.3% biological agents. SARS-CoV-2 infection was mild in most cases, while 4.6% had a severe course and/or died. The latter had comorbidities, used glucocorticoids, and had antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) more frequently and higher disease activity at the time of infection. In the multivariate analysis, high blood pressure (OR 5.1, 95% CI 1.8-15.0), the diagnosis of APS (4.7, 95% CI 1.2-15.8), and the use of glucocorticoids (10 mg/day or more: OR 5.5, 95% CI 1.6-20.5) were associated with severe hospitalization and/or death from COVID-19 (WHO-EO >= 5). Conclusion(s): In this cohort of SLE patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, most had a symptomatic course, 22.1% were hospitalized, and 5% required mechanical ventilation. Mortality was close to 3%. The diagnosis of APS, having high blood pressure, and the use of glucocorticoids were significantly associated with severe COVID-19.

11.
Rheumatology (United Kingdom) ; 62(Supplement 2):ii142, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2321776

ABSTRACT

Background/Aims Haemophagocytic lymphiohistiocytosis (HLH) is a rare, underrecognised hyperinflammatory syndrome, characterised by immune dysregulation. Without treatment, the ensuing cytokine storm leads to high mortality. Secondary HLH (sHLH) is triggered by malignancy, infection, autoimmunity and medicines;treatment with immunosuppression is consensus- rather than evidence-based and extrapolated from primary HLH. Sheffield hosts a mature HLH multidisciplinary advisory group (MDAG). Here we evaluate the cause, treatment, requirement for critical care and mortality of people with HLH managed through the MDAG in a period including the coronavirus pandemic but prior to NHS England approval of anakinra (IL-1 antagonist) for HLH. Methods This retrospective evaluation (approved locally STH 10850) identified patients from MDAG records 1st October 2016 to 30th September 2021. Data from electronic/paper records was analysed using Microsoft Excel. Results HLH triggers were infection (viral 34%, bacterial 10%), haematological (35%), rheumatological (13%) and other (8%). Rheumatological causes were Still's disease (n=5);antiphospholipid syndrome (n=2);JO1 dermatomyositis (n=1);SLE (n=1);and rheumatoid arthritis (n=1). Other causes included unknown (n=3);combined systemic JIA and sickle cell crisis (n=1);medication (alemtuzumab) (n=1);and primary HLH (n=1). Overall mortality was 53% and highest in HLH with a haematological malignancy trigger (82%) Prior to the COVID19 pandemic (pre-March 2020), the commonest trigger of HLH was haematological malignancy (47%);after March 2020, the commonest trigger was infection (64%);COVID-19 explained 42% of cases. Mortality fell from 72% to 31%. Conclusion In this real-world series of people with HLH, mortality and critical care requirement was high. HLH triggers reflect published evidence as does poor prognosis in haematological malignancy-associated HLH. No-HLH associated with non-haematological malignancy was identified;we may need to improve MDAG reach into oncology. Seeming reduction in mortality following the COVID-19 pandemic may reflect increased recognition of COVID-19 induced hyperinflammation along with locallyagreed access to anakinra for COVID-19-induced HLH. The increase in infection related HLH cases since March 2020 is explained largely by COVID-19 cases. This has led to a relative reduction in cases related to haematological malignancy. HLH requires multidisciplinary management and better research to improve treatment. (Table Presented).

12.
American Journal of Gastroenterology ; 117(10 Supplement 2):S1201, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2325965

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Hyperthyroidism is known to increase catabolism of vitamin-K-dependent clotting factors (II, VII, IX, X) and increase the response of vitamin K antagonists, usually warfarin. Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) has been associated with thyroid dysfunction (TD), especially with autoimmune thyroid disease. In the below case, a patient with known PBC on warfarin is found to have severely elevated INR related to new-onset hyperthyroidism with clinical consequences of hemorrhage including upper GI bleed. Case Description/Methods: A 64-year-old female with PBC and antiphospholipid antibody syndrome on warfarin was admitted for hemorrhagic epiglottitis requiring emergency intubation and supratherapeutic INR. Her PBC was diagnosed as stage II on biopsy 23 years ago and has remained clinically stable on ursodiol therapy. On presentation, the patient was tachycardic, tachypneic, and had O2 saturations <90% on HFNC prior to intubation. Physical exam significant for larger goiter with diffuse upper airway swelling. She was admitted and found to have COVID-19 infection, INR .16.0 and PT>200.0 (limit of lab), WBC of 22.8, and lactate of 2.5. LFTs WNL aside from albumin of 2.0. TSH was <0.0017 (limit of lab) and free T4 of 3.4, free T3 of 5.3. TSH receptor antibody (TRAB) and thyroid stimulating immunoglobulin (TSI) levels were normal. Her last TSH was normal a year ago. CTA chest found a 5.7cm heterogeneous, partially calcified superior mediastinal mass consistent with multinodular thyroid goiter. Patient was initially given prothrombin complex concentrate and vitamin K with correction of INR over the following few days. She was extubated and started on methimazole. During the hospital course, she was found to have coffee ground emesis for which an EGD was done with findings of non-bleeding gastric ulcer (Forrest Class IIc) and LA Grade D esophagitis with adherent clot and bleeding for which hemostatic spray was applied. Patient was discharged a few days later following resumption of warfarin and on pantoprazole and methimazole. Discussion(s): The above case demonstrates a rare case of PBC and new-onset hyperthyroidism due to multinodular thyroid goiter causing significantly elevated INR in the setting of warfarin use with hospital course complicated by GI bleed. PBC is associated with TD - hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, and thyroid cancer. Hyperthyroidism is less commonly associated with PBC compared to other TDs but should be considered especially with a finding of elevated INR.

13.
BMC Ophthalmol ; 23(1): 197, 2023 May 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2321429

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Purtscher retinopathy is a rare occlusive microangiopathy comprising a constellation of retinal signs including cotton wool spots, retinal hemorrhages and Purtscher flecken. While classical Purtscher must be antedated by a traumatic incident, Purtscher-like retinopathy is used to refer to the same clinical syndrome in the absence of trauma. Various non-traumatic conditions have been associated with Purtscher-like retinopathy e.g. acute pancreatitis, preeclampsia, parturition, renal failure and multiple connective tissue disorders. In this case study, we report the occurrence of Purtscher-like retinopathy following coronary artery bypass grafting in a female patient with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). CASE PRESENTATION: A 48-year-old Caucasian female patient presented with a complaint of acute painless diminution of vision in the left eye (OS) that occurred approximately two months earlier. Clinical history revealed that the patient underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) two months earlier and that visual symptoms started 4 days thereafter. Furthermore, the patient reported undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) one year before for another myocardial ischemic event. Ophthalmological examination revealed multiple yellowish-white superficial retinal lesions i.e. cotton-wool spots, exclusively in the posterior pole and predominantly macular within the temporal vascular arcades only OS. Fundus examination of the right eye (OD) was normal and the anterior segment examination of both eyes (OU) was unremarkable. A diagnosis of Purtscher-like retinopathy was made based on clinical signs, suggestive history and consolidated by fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) of macula, optic nerve head (ONH) according to the diagnostic guidelines of Miguel. The patient was referred to a rheumatologist to identify the underlying systemic cause and was diagnosed with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). CONCLUSIONS: We report a case of Purtscher-like retinopathy complicating primary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) following coronary artery bypass grafting. This conveys a message to clinicians that patients presenting with Purtscher-like retinopathy should undergo meticulous systemic work-up in order to identify potentially life-threatening underlying systemic diseases.


Subject(s)
Antiphospholipid Syndrome , Pancreatitis , Papilledema , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Retinal Diseases , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Antiphospholipid Syndrome/complications , Antiphospholipid Syndrome/diagnosis , Acute Disease , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Pancreatitis/complications , Retinal Diseases/diagnosis , Retinal Diseases/etiology , Fluorescein Angiography/methods , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects
14.
Radiologic Technology ; 94(5):364-371, 2023.
Article in English | CINAHL | ID: covidwho-2315221

ABSTRACT

The article discusses the task of radiologic technologists to know clotting disorders and image them best. Topics covered include the various symptoms and blood clots of patients with thrombotic disorders, and medical imaging's beneficial indication of the severity and blood clots' location in the patient's circulatory system, and support for accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment. Also noted is the boost for positive patient outcomes when the health care team works together.

15.
Journal of Investigative Medicine ; 71(1):212, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2312151

ABSTRACT

Case Report: A 26-year-old woman with a history of warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia, immune thrombocytopenia, triple positive antiphospholipid syndrome, and chronic migraine presented to the emergency department with worsening generalized fatigue for one week associated with headache, dyspnea on exertion, nausea, vomiting and lightheadedness. Of note, she had received her second dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine 4 days prior to presentation. On admission, patient was found to be severely anemic with a hemoglobin of 4.3g/dL which is decreased from her baseline hemoglobin of 9-10.5g/dL;however, W-AIHA precluded the administration of blood product until adequate blood with the appropriate antibodies could be acquired. During the hospitalization, hemoglobin decreased to 3.3g/dL. Patient was then administered the most compatible blood product which she tolerated well. Hematology was consulted who started the patient on hydroxychloroquine, high dose methylprednisolone, and Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIG). Throughout the admission, the patient remained asymptomatic. After 2 days of IVIG, three days of high dose glucocorticoids, and one unit of packed red blood cells, the patient's hemoglobin increased to 7.2g/dL. Patient was discharged home on prednisone taper and hydroxychloroquine. Conclusion(s): Episodes of hemolytic anemia after either the first or second dose of mRNA COVID vaccines are rare and have occurred in patients with known hematological pathology as well as patients without any history of hematologic or immunologic disorders. When taking the history of patients presenting with hemolytic anemia, it is important to query recent vaccinations as, while rare, mRNA COVID vaccine may well be the etiology. While this ultimately will likely not change patient management, this information would be beneficial for further study.

16.
American Journal of Reproductive Immunology ; 89(S1):23-73, 2023.
Article in English | Academic Search Complete | ID: covidwho-2312063

ABSTRACT

S-01.5 Impact of aging on the frequency, phenotype, and function of CD4+ T cells in the human... Zheng Shen SP 1 sp , Mickey V. Patel SP 1 sp , Landon G. vom Steeg SP 1 sp , Marta Rodriguez-Garcia SP 2 sp , Charles R. Wira SP 1 sp I SP 1 sp Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA, SP 2 sp Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA i B Problem b : Since CD4+ T cells are essential for regulating adaptive immune responses and for long lasting mucosal protection, changes in CD4+ T cells are likely to affect protective immunity. S-02.2 Impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy on fetal immune state Leena B. Mithal I Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine;Lurie Children's Hospital Chicago, IL, USA i SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy is associated with increased risk of adverse maternal and pregnancy outcomes. The objectives including: 1) review treatment considerations during pregnancy and postpartum, pregnancy outcomes and postpartum challenges in women with established rheumatoid arthritis, 2) review treatment considerations during pregnancy and postpartum, pregnancy outcomes and pregnancy challenges in women with established lupus, and 3) review treatment considerations during pregnancy and postpartum and pregnancy outcomes in women with established antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. S-15.6 Longitudinal expression of serum immune markers across pregnancy and fetal growth rest... Shailaja Sopory, Khushboo Kaushal, Ayushi Ayushi, Nikhil Sharma, Shinjini Bhatnagar, Bapu Koundinya Desiraju, Ramachandran Thiruvengadam I Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India i B Problem b : Pregnancy is a delicate balance of pro and anti-inflammatory cytokines that are appropriately expressed during different stages of pregnancy. [Extracted from the article] Copyright of American Journal of Reproductive Immunology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

17.
Int J Stroke ; 18(4): 383-391, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2317287

ABSTRACT

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a prothrombotic autoimmune disease with heterogeneous clinicopathological manifestations and is a well-established cause of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and transient ischemic attack (TIA), particularly in younger patients. There is growing recognition of a wider spectrum of APS-associated cerebrovascular lesions, including white matter hyperintensities, cortical atrophy, and infarcts, which may have clinically important neurocognitive sequalae. Diagnosis of APS-associated AIS/TIA requires expert review of clinical and laboratory information. Management poses challenges, given the potential for substantial morbidity and recurrent thrombosis, additional risk conferred by conventional cardiovascular risk factors, and limited evidence base regarding optimal antithrombotic therapy for secondary prevention. In this review, we summarize key features of APS-associated cerebrovascular disorders, with focus on clinical and laboratory aspects of diagnostic evaluation. The current status of prognostic markers is considered. We review the evidence base for antithrombotic treatment in APS-associated stroke and discuss uncertainties, including the optimal intensity of anticoagulation and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants. Clinical practice recommendations are provided, covering antithrombotic treatment, supportive management, and options for anticoagulant-refractory cases, and we highlight the benefits of adopting a considered, multidisciplinary team approach.


Subject(s)
Antiphospholipid Syndrome , Ischemic Attack, Transient , Ischemic Stroke , Stroke , Humans , Antiphospholipid Syndrome/complications , Antiphospholipid Syndrome/diagnosis , Antiphospholipid Syndrome/drug therapy , Stroke/drug therapy , Ischemic Stroke/drug therapy , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Ischemic Attack, Transient/complications , Antibodies, Antiphospholipid/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/adverse effects
18.
Int J Mol Sci ; 24(4)2023 Feb 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2310326

ABSTRACT

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the third most common cause of death worldwide. The incidence of VTE varies according to different countries, ranging from 1-2 per 1000 person-years in Western Countries, while it is lower in Eastern Countries (<1 per 1000 person-years). Many risk factors have been identified in patients developing VTE, but the relative contribution of each risk factor to thrombotic risk, as well as pathogenetic mechanisms, have not been fully described. Herewith, we provide a comprehensive review of the most common risk factors for VTE, including male sex, diabetes, obesity, smoking, Factor V Leiden, Prothrombin G20210A Gene Mutation, Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1, oral contraceptives and hormonal replacement, long-haul flight, residual venous thrombosis, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, trauma and fractures, pregnancy, immobilization, antiphospholipid syndrome, surgery and cancer. Regarding the latter, the incidence of VTE seems highest in pancreatic, liver and non-small cells lung cancer (>70 per 1000 person-years) and lowest in breast, melanoma and prostate cancer (<20 per 1000 person-years). In this comprehensive review, we summarized the prevalence of different risk factors for VTE and the potential molecular mechanisms/pathogenetic mediators leading to VTE.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Thrombophilia , Venous Thromboembolism , Venous Thrombosis , Female , Humans , Male , Venous Thromboembolism/genetics , SARS-CoV-2 , Risk Factors , Venous Thrombosis/genetics , Thrombophilia/genetics
19.
Journal of Wound Management and Research ; 18(3):234-238, 2022.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-2274738

ABSTRACT

A 44-year-old woman with underlying systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid antibody syndrome presented with nausea and vomiting after her 2nd vaccination for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Thirteen days after warfarin injection was administered along with steroid therapy, the patient suffered sudden right shoulder pain, paresthesia, and swelling, suggesting acute compartment syndrome. The warfarin regimen was bridged to low molecular weight heparin and fasciotomy was performed. Multiple hematoma evacuation after fasciotomy was done and the patient was referred for skin necrosis. Frequent debridement and negative pressure wound therapy were performed to heal the right upper extremity skin defect. Afterwards, the patient experienced hemorrhage in her left upper extremity and was treated conservatively with simple compression. This report suggests that patients undergoing anticoagulation therapy for antiphospholipid syndrome should be closely monitored for subcutaneous hemorrhage, and that prompt diagnosis and treatment may prevent adverse re-sults. If massive skin necrosis occurs, multiple surgical debridement procedures and application of negative pressure wound therapy may be an option. © 2022 Korean Wound Management Society.

20.
Coronaviruses ; 3(5):47-56, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2260526

ABSTRACT

Background: Maternal mortality prevention and delivering optimal outcomes for both mother and fetus is the utmost concern of health systems in any country. Objective(s): This study aimed to examine maternal mortality in pregnant women since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in Hamadan province, western Iran. Examining the causes of maternal mortality can be valuable in identifying mortality factors in line with prospective strategic plans. Method(s): This case series study introduces the data of seven deceased pregnant women, the deaths of whom occurred since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic (December 2019 - March 2021) in the hospitals of cities within Hamadan province. All data were reported at the time of death or at least 14 days after hospital admission. In this study, epidemiological features and pregnancy history, background dis-eases, clinical symptoms, initial vital signs, medications in use, clinical laboratory values, delivery type, and neonatal outcome were assessed, respectively. Result(s): In the seven maternal mortality cases reported in this study, three women succumbed to pregnan-cy-related causes (two cases of preeclampsia and one case of antiphospholipid syndrome), and four women to severe coronavirus disease. All deceased mothers had been admitted to the intensive care unit as a result of severe illness. Four cases concerned a background condition as well, which included thrombo-embolic disorders, epilepsy, and lupus. In mortality cases, two women displayed a BMI score over 30. One maternal death had occurred 42 days postpartum, while five deaths had occurred prior to 37 weeks of gestation, and one past 37 weeks of gestation. Conclusion(s): This report provided valuable information on maternal mortality factors. Maternal mortality necessitates a careful acquisition of monitoring data, but in the prevailing pandemic circumstances, cau-tion necessitates raising awareness of the maternal mortality potential in women with COVID-19 diagnosis in the second or third trimester. Pregnancy care programs must focus on recognizing high-risk groups of mothers-to-be with background conditions and risk factors for pregnancy, given that early diagnosis and prompt referral are invaluable in the immediate treatment and relief of pregnant mothers-to-be.Copyright © 2022 Bentham Science Publishers.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL